
Typical piece price reduction of 20-30%
Rapid/low cost prototyping
Lower tooling cost than foam and injection molding
Loads up faster than foam
Higher yield point than foam
More stroke than polyurethane foam
Highly efficient force vs. deflection curves
Performance can be tuned by changing initial material thickness—no tooling changes required
Initial thickness available between 1.0 mm-5.0 mm
Typical mass reduction of 20-30%
Polypropylene sheet offers lightweight parts
Parts nest for up to 90% space reduction
Requires less plant floor space, lower shipping costs, lower handling costs
Greater stroke and more efficiency over same packaging space
Polyurethane foam products do not nest for storage and transportation
100% melt recyclable
Closed loop regrind process eliminates waste